A Wake-Up Call: NY Times Cuts
Tri-State Arts Coverage

Last month, the gold-standard and most influential arts newspaper, The New York Times, announced it was eliminating its coverage of New York tri-state regional theatre, restaurants, and galleries. And as recently as last week The Wall Street Journal had a similar announcement. 

To some organizations, this came as a shock, having relied on the Times for publicly validating their shows, building their audiences, and providing third-party support for their grant proposals. But my sense is that this was predictable, a long time in coming. And if you’re as devoted to reading New York City arts coverage as I am, you’re probably as worried about reductions that could come there as well. That The New York Times decided to cut arts coverage isn’t really a surprise, because readership in newspapers in general has been declining for more than a decade and other traditional print publications continue to struggle to find a business model to sustain them into the future. Arguably, the Times is doing better than most.

Sadly, the audience for the arts — even at 76 million strong — is still too small a demographic to draw the kinds of advertisers that could support a full flank of arts reporters. And because journalism is a business, driven by circulation and eyeballs, advertising dollars follow audience size.

Thus, this news provides yet another siren call for a redoubled focus on the kind of one-to-one digital marketing that I started our company to foster more than 15 years ago when we launched PatronMail, the first email service for the arts. It was clear then that the future of audience building lay in developing individualized “opt-in” relationships with patrons and donors that no longer relied on an intermediary such as The New York Times.

The silver lining is that our research shows that arts patrons are looking to newspapers less and less to find out about arts events near their home. Over the past 10 years we’ve surveyed more than a million online arts patrons, and it’s clear that their reliance on print publications continues a precipitous decline.

oct16-newletter_chartTo the extent that your organization has gone full-throttle on digital marketing, you’ve built a buffer. Here are a few “must-do” things that I hope all readers of this blog are doing — things that Michelle Paul and I wrote about in our book Breaking the Fifth Wall, published five years ago:

  • Constantly building your email list
  • Targeting your marketing messages
  • Building your social media presence (particularly on Facebook, but also on the newer platforms as their popularity becomes established)
  • Following up with first-time ticket buyers and converting them into repeat buyers
  • Targeting subscribers and donors right after they see one of your shows  

If we follow the trend, it’s not hard to conclude that during the next five years, traditional arts coverage will continue to be cut back. Although I can’t imagine The New York Times without coverage of classical music, for instance, if I were running an orchestra I’d be getting ready now, because it’s clearly within the realm of possibility.  

If you’re relying on any third party — whether it’s your local newspaper, television station, or radio station — to get the word out to your audience, that is a foundation with some serious cracks in it. By now, most forward-thinking arts managers have already adopted the CRM approach to building audiences that I mentioned earlier.

Sometimes change happens incrementally, and sometimes it happens with a jolt. Recently it was with a jolt, and I hope the shockwaves of The New York Times and the Journal’s announcements reach deep into your management team and your board before it’s too late.

Suggested Blog Posts

Learn More about PatronManager, the powerful CRM platform that helps you sell more tickets, raise more money, and cultivate stronger bonds with your audience, all in one database.

3 responses to “A Wake-Up Call: NY Times Cuts
Tri-State Arts Coverage

  1. Of course the “online arts patrons” would not be depending on print publications. They’re online! But we baby-boomers still enjoy reading our newspapers with our cup, or two, of coffee each morning. And, by the way, we old folk are the majority when it comes to attending and financially supporting arts organizations. It’s a shame.

  2. I’m one of those too – I like to read the newpaper in printed for. The point I was trying to make is that the newspapers are very likely to cut back their arts coverage.

  3. Yet another ‘boomer’ here. I run a large arts organization in the Midwest and we have migrated to 90% marketing online. The return for print, radio and TV marketing was just abysmal so we pushed into the realm of the online and made massive strides (particularly with audiences that represent the future of the arts). Having just recently moved to Patron Manager, we are excited about its potential for targeting our audience even more effectively.

Comments are closed.